Crypto can gain value as the global corporatocracy bombards Alt-media.

Alt-media has been under heavy bombardment as tech corporations advance by de-platforming content creators for wrong think, triggered by the latest “daily shooter” event.  On the truther front, Infowars received a  youtube strike for doubting the authenticity of CNN’s  poster child, David Hogg, who are attacking the NRA.

Also on youtube, Baked Alaska was handed down a three-month live stream suspension for daring to hold a debate between skeptic/liberalist Sargon and white nationalist provocateur, Andrew Anglin,  even though JF Gariepy thought that Sargon won. This pretty much calls into question the future of the chaotic yet entertaining “internet bloodsports”, pretty much displaying that “open inquiry” and “the marketplace of ideas” in the west is a complete sham.


Read more on steemit.






Jays Analysis of Bertrand Russell as a Genocidal Maniac

The internet provides a plethora of perspectives and when it comes to criticisms of technocracy, it is no different.  Jay Dyer provides great commentary from an Eastern traditionalist perspective as he journeys into reading all the works of the global technocrats.

Worshippers of scientism continue to believe in Gene Roddenberry as some sort of Science Philosopher ( he majored in Police “science”) who tries to convince you of a coming rainbow utopia, but in fact, the real ones, such as Bertrand,  tell you of the coming totalitarian Global State.

Watch the Rest:





The Battle for Technocracy: Globalist Google’s latest assault

As we have seen in the last few months,  the cold civil war continues with global tech companies and the countries of the West’s  launching the latest salvo in demolishing any dissent.

The latest victim was Jordan Peterson, whose Gmail account and youtube channel were disabled temporarily.  Independent content will continue to be attacked.  Crypto Anarchists blockchain and other Alt-tech systems from Neo-reactionary off shoots are still emerging, but not mature enough yet to defend and launch a counter attack.


The Sokal Affair II

It is quite entertaining that in the Age of the Alt’s, that the so-called skeptic community is now the primary target of ire by the global technocrats. Post-Modern gibberish nonsense is a useful control mechanism in atomizing the individual to a blank slate, and the Skeptic community has been at the forefront in attacking it. In repeating Alan Sokal’s experiment more than twenty years ago by publishing a paper full of gibberish to the post-modern social sciences, perhaps they will deal a blow to Post Modernism. Although I think they are probably not as skeptical about the Gaia climate cult,  I think it is interesting that they have included a bogus link to climate change in the paper.  Perhaps even they have concluded that there exists a ridiculous level of absurd results or causes of climate change.

Gad Saad is right,  a Nobel Prize should be awarded for such statements as:

significant problems for gender identity and reproductive identity within social and family dynamics, is exclusionary to disenfranchised communities based upon gender or reproductive identity, is an enduring source of abuse for women and other gender-marginalized groups and individuals, is the universal performative source of rape, and is the conceptual driver behind much of climate change.

See the video below:






The Corporate Tech Class Final Verdict: Useless Drones

When I was first employed in IT at a Fortune 100 company, I originally was impressed with the professionalism of the people that worked in corporate IT. The IT personnel at the smaller shops I worked at were good too, but not at an “enterprise” level. For one, they had a better knowledge of selecting vendors who are better suited to align with a particular IT use case, as opposed to the Slashdot or Microsoft crowd who feigned undying loyalty to a vendor or open source product that can be used in any scenario. They also tended to have at least some sort of consistent methodology when designing and deploying systems, with somewhat better aptitude at capacity planning.

As time went on, I discovered that these characteristics were counterbalanced by the many employees that were earning a premium for pretty much being dead weight and territorial, more focused on process as opposed to the outcomes.  Most of the corporate IT Managers tend to repeat flowery sounding rhetoric that describes nothing of actual substance while others follow suit and repeat the same catchphrases over and over again.  A whole stream of tech posts on Linked In will illustrate this behavior if you can stomach it. Although they actually belong to the upper-middle-class as part of the top 5% of income,  they ridiculously think of themselves as working class.

Outside of this sphere, they all appear to be prone to the belief in social science nonsense and the administrative state. Perhaps it is the belief that a “good” methodology with therapeutic rhetoric coupled with an appropriate expert is “scientific.”  Maybe they know deep down that corporate IT’s massive bureaucracy’s primary function is to perpetuate bureaucracy in real life. If it is revealed that the administrative state is full of charlatans then, they too, will be discovered to be an impostor, unworthy of the opulent lifestyle in the suburbs or gentrified urban neighborhoods that they reside in. While they live in luxury, those that prove to actually provide value continue to be crushed by the increasing panopticon police state. They continue to support the current trajectory even though they too are slowly and systematically being replaced by cheaper workers abroad.

Culturally, compared to the smaller IT departments I have observed, Big Corporate IT employees are the most miserable, petty,  and nihilistic; Watching their 401K’s as if their whole purpose is to wait and retire on money that probably will be worth a lot less than at present. All fit like a glove with the current Malthusian death cult of the West. I suspect the birthrate of these people is pretty close to 1 on average. ( It would be interesting to see if there is some data on Fortune 100 IT employees.).

In the alt-media, I have often heard the disparaging remarks about the lower class believing what they are told and watching reality shows or some other trash.  In my opinion, they are not the problem.  It is the Upper middle class that believes what they are told. They are the ones that are delusional and are susceptible to propaganda. Globalism is a death cult, these people will always be on their side.

An opportunity against the enraged anointed in the Media War.

It is entertaining that the media is continuously enraged against certain sections of the alt media. The anointed members of the legacy media have been completely triggered by the more recent entrants in the globalist war, the so called youtube skeptics,  alt-light, civic nationalists, libertarian nationalists, Neo-reactionaries, alt-right, and the 4chan community. In other words, the forces of KEK.

While they are concentrating on the aforementioned group,  agorists, truthers, bitcoin ancaps, and others can take advantage of the distraction and continue to build upon peer to peer infrastructures to disseminate information. Other than the culture war circus occurring on the surface, nothing has really changed in the core as far as power structures are concerned.

But, it would be a mistake to take the approach that Jeffrey Tucker, who seems to have joined the Koch CATO gambit, has taken. Parroting packaged responses of fascism to arguments that they disagree with promotes linear thinking. Linear thinking only helps the centralists.

I think the situation has bought us some time and that there is a golden opportunity to hammer away at the legacy media.

Toy Computer Models.

The money quote about soft science practitioners. John O’ Sullivan writes:

Those trained in the ‘hard’ sciences know the score.  It is why Nobel Prize winning Physicist Dr. Ivar Giaever and others decry man-made global warming. They have disdain for those in the ‘soft’ earth sciences who shy away from the traditional methods of scientific inquiry: weighing the empirical evidence, testing hypotheses, using real materials, actual measurements. Government academics would rather play on their GIGO toy computer models instead because here the answers are tweaked to fit the questions.

Indeed.  Read the rest….


2016: The Year of the Big Data Charlatan

Another  great article from William Briggs,

The data tools are part of the problem in two ways: (1) the models themselves, and (2) the false belief that everything can be quantified.

Indeed, at the individual level, ends are purposeful and subjective.  The  ordering of each persons value cannot be measured by an outside instrument. Atoms, on the other hand, are not purposeful and their interactions are quite predictable. The interactions can also be measured.

Read the rest here….





2017: The year of the Alt’s

Alt- tech, Alt-media, Alt-left, Alt-right, Alt-lite, Alt-west, Alt-currency, Alt-governance…. and on and on….

The internet reformation has led to the maturation of multiple forces that are in opposition to the Globalist Technocracy agenda. Many have sprouted from the maturation of Web 2.0 that occurred around 2006, a little after the founding of youtube.

Representation from a pluralism of ideologies across the political spectrum has emerged. From these disparate perspectives, many labels are used to describe globalism,  such as  Neocon-Neoliberalism, Rainbow Fascism, Global Corporatism, the therapeutic managerial state,  The Cathedral, and many others. The reality is, as Patrick Wood has mentioned, centralized global technocracy consisting of the Hub and spoke model.

A positive development in opposition over the last few years is the emergence of the Alt-Tech. Some in Tech have realized that the idea of the compatibility  Rousseauian and Darwinian ideologies is completely ridiculous. Some, such as the Dark Enlightenment, have also dispensed with the Whig version of history.  This faction will continue to grow more this year.

With the emergence of Trump, the result of Brexit, and the rise of Nationalism globally, the gatekeepers have decided to attack Alt-media head-on under the label of “Fake News”. From a globalist perspective, this makes sense. As Mencius Moldbug has mentioned,  the system requires centralized information flowing downstream to the masses. Youtubers and bloggers disseminating and deconstructing information and promoting various philosophies represent a distributed information model, which can increasingly short-circuit the system and collapse their edifice. Obviously, this cannot continue.

The multitude of neo-mandarin drones, who worship the therapeutic centralized gatekeepers and entertainers will rage ever increasingly as opposition to the technocratic cult increases. They will be the foot soldiers for the technocrats in the information war.

Perhaps this is the year when the ideology of technocracy is infused into the mainstream.

This will indeed be an interesting year, to say the least.




“We are all Birchers now”

The fruition of the war of ideas between “alt” media and the IYI idiots of the main corporate and state networks has been the best aspect of this unusual and insane election cycle.

It is amusing that the Washington Post have blamed Russia for the election results. Apparently,  all the independent bloggers out there are paid  by Russian agents. This is quite interesting since independent bloggers represent a plethora of ideas all over the political spectrum: Ancaps, Anarcho-syndicates,Classical Liberals, Alt-left, Alt-right, Alt-west, Anti-War, Neo-cameralists, Agorists, Distributists, Neo-monarchists, Neo-pagans, Greenbackers, Neo-traditionalists, Platonists, Trivium proponents, Neo-byzantines, etc….

The Birchers were demonized  back  in the day for blaming the Russians for infiltrating the press. Since the networks have taken this mantle, Newsweek can now  publish on their next magazine title, “We are all Birchers now”.